In this Article, Professor Rogers challenges the assumption that securities transfer law has always been based on negotiable certificates and suggests that the reign of negotiability is a relatively recent, and brief, phase in the long history of investment securities trading. Professor Rogers posits that the difficulties currently facing the law of securities transfers are in large part due to the transition from paper to electronic representations of investments. To place these challenges into perspective, Professor Rogers first surveys the history of securities trading and then examines the theoretical underpinnings of the law of securities transfers.
James S. Rogers. "Negotiability, Property, and Identity." Cardozo Law Review 12, (1990): 471-508.
Accounting Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Economics Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Secured Transactions Commons, Securities Law Commons