These remarks, prepared for the Boston College Third World Law Journal Reparations Symposium. compare the goals and viability of reparations claims as tort suits. I contrast two approaches observed in the claims: a "doing justice" model, which involves seeking compensation in important cases of uncorrected or uncompensated injustice, and a "social welfare" model that seeks to change the distribution of wealth. Claims under the first category are far more consistent with tort doctrine and likely to meet their goals than social welfare-based claims.
Keith N. Hylton,
A Framework for Reparations Claims,
B.C. Third World L.J.